- Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark full#
- Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark Pc#
- Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark series#
What this means for most people is lower power consumption and much improved performance at the same time.
Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark Pc#
Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, like the rest of AMD's Zen 2 processors, is built on a 7nm manufacturing node. Even though the 2700X excels at video production, streamers should look elsewhere. PC gaming and desktop performance is generally governed by six or less cores but the 2700X offers value for money to workstation users. Whilst the 6 core, 12 thread 8700K beats the 2700X in single and quad core performance by around 15%, the 2700X wins on multi-core workloads.
The expected launch price of $329 includes a Wraith Prism cooler and is in the same price bracket as the 1800X and Intel’s Coffee Lake i7-8700K. Early benchmarks indicate that the 2700X has a slightly greater effective speed than the 1800X, although further benchmarks are necessary to quantify this.
Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark series#
The 2700X is compatible with both the new 400 series and 300 series of motherboards. Whilst there is no increase in the number of cores, the stock base / boost clocks appear to have received a bump up to 3.7 / 4.3 GHz from 3.6 / 4.0 GHz. This new Pinnacle Ridge processor features the Zen+ architecture with 12nm lithography compared to 14nm previously. The 8 core, 16 thread 2700X is AMD’s second generation Ryzen 7 flagship following in the wake of the Ryzen 7 1800X which continues to offer excellent multi-core value for money. The 3700X severely bottlenecks a 2070S: gamers should investigate the 9600K, which is both cheaper and faster.
Streaming with dedicated hardware such as NVENC or a separate stream PC will nearly always result in fewer dropped frames.
Ryzen 7 3700x cpu benchmark full#
At $320 USD, the 3700X offers reasonable value to full time media encoders but general desktop users, gamers and even streamers should look elsewhere. The heavily hyped 3700X, paired with a 2060S, offers real world gaming performance comparable to the $80 USD entry level 4-core, 4-thread Intel Core i3-9100F. With strong single-core scores, the 3700X should offer very strong gaming performance but in reality it is let down by its memory controller, which, although significantly improved over previous Ryzen iterations, still has limited bandwidth and high latency. We had to use a fixed clock OC (rather than Offset/PBO) to avoid significant frame drops in Fortnite. With a Gammaxx 400 cooler we were able to maintain a 43.25x OC during our EFps tests. Unlike lower end Ryzen 3000 SKUs, the 3700X comes with a half decent cooler but AMD should not have bothered since a $20 aftermarket cooler is still quieter, easier to change, and better at cooling. Comparing the 3700X to Intel’s i7-9700K shows that, when overclocked, the 3700X is 26% faster at 64-core computations but 13% slower for gaming and desktop (sub eight core performance).
Out of the box, the 3700X, 3600X and 3600 achieve similar quad core speeds but the 16 threaded 3700X is 30% faster at multi-core computations than the 12 threaded 3600X. The 3700X is a $320 USD 8-core, 16-thread mid-range Ryzen 3000 series CPU.
0 kommentar(er)
